Prediction of Merel Hoedt [703rd] vs Ikumi Yamazaki [407th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L W L L W L
Form
W W L W W L W L W LH2H: Hoedt 1 - 0 Yamazaki
They have played 3 sets in total, with Hoedt winning 2 and Yamazaki winning 1. The last match between Hoedt and Yamazaki was at the W50 Brisbane, 11-11-2024, Q3, Hard with Merel Hoedt getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Merel Hoedt | 1 |
| Ikumi Yamazaki | 0 |
| Hoedt | Stats | Yamazaki |
|---|---|---|
| 22% (2-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (12-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 703 | Ranking | 407 |
| 468 | Highest Rank | 407 |
| 25 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 1 |
| 54% (181-157) | Career Total W/L | 62% (115-71) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Merel Hoedt
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
78%
(
78 of
100)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
45%
(
45 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:49:0 | Average Match Time | 2:49:0 |
| 78% (78/100) | 1st Serve % | 73% (66/90) |
| 62% (48/78) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (35/66) |
| 32% (7/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
| 54% (7/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (6/15) |
| 50% (45/90) | Return Points Win % | 45% (45/100) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Merel Hoedt vs Ikumi Yamazaki Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hoedt 1 - 0 Yamazaki
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hoedt has won 37.89% of points on their second serve, while Yamazaki has won 38.94%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hoedt, in recent form, has won 56.16% of their opponent's second serve points, while Yamazaki has won 55.71%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.44% and 38.05% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hoedt has saved 46.4% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Yamazaki has saved 42.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hoedt has won 46% of matches played (W/L 23/ 27), with Yamazaki winning 62.69% (W/L 42/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hoedt has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 115/ 92), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Yamazaki has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 100% (W/L 7/ 0), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Hoedt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.37% of matches (W/L 18/ 20), where as Yamazaki has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.3% of matches (W/L 38/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hoedt winning 1 times and Yamazaki being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hoedt winning 2 and Yamazaki winning 1. The last match between Hoedt and Yamazaki was at the W50 Brisbane, 11-11-2024, Q3, Hard with Merel Hoedt getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:49:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hoedt and Yamazaki have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hoedt winning 1 times and Yamazaki 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hoedt winning 0, and Yamazaki 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hoedt has played against opponents with an average rank of 380.56 while Yamazaki has played against players with an average rank of 436.51.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hoedt has won 31% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Yamazaki has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hoedt has converted 38.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Yamazaki has converted 40.08% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Merel Hoedt vs Ikumi Yamazaki Best Odds For The Match
Merel Hoedt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Merel Hoedt
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Demi Tran
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
Player
Merel Hoedt
47%
(
47 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
43%
(
23 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cristina Diaz Adrover
Player
Merel Hoedt
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Friederike Nolte
78%
(
51 of
65)
1st Serve %
72%
(
59 of
82)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Abbagnato
Player
Merel Hoedt
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
22 of
33)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
52%
(
15 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
45
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Britt Du Pree
Player
Merel Hoedt
53%
(
56 of
105)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
3
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
3
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
49%
(
24 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
45%
(
47 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alice Robbe
Player
Merel Hoedt
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
77%
(
49 of
64)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
1
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marine Szostak
Player
Merel Hoedt
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
83%
(
53 of
64)
5
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 4-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yui Chikaraishi
Player
Merel Hoedt
71%
(
60 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
8
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
25%
(
6 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
54%
(
45 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ikumi Yamazaki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Kelly Keller
78%
(
66 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
14
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
9 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Yara Bartashevich
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
75%
(
66 of
88)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
5-7 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Laura Samson
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
46%
(
13 of
28)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
54%
(
25 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
53
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Eleonora Alvisi
86%
(
67 of
78)
1st Serve %
85%
(
82 of
97)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
43%
(
29 of
67)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
59%
(
46 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
55 of
97)
87
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Himeno Sakatsume
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
34 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Kyoka Okamura
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Hayu Kinoshita
73%
(
92 of
126)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
102)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
43%
(
54 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
121
Total Points Won
107
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Hoedt vs Yamazaki?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Hoedt Vs Yamazaki is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (181/157) | Win/Loss | 62% (115/71) |
| 53% (408/355) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (250/172) |
| 52% (3570/3248) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2060/1785) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 355 | Aces Total | 120 |
| 0.57 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1876 | Total Double Faults | 497 |
| 1:38:45 | Average Match Time | 1:25:43 |
| 475.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 414.17 |
| 64% (12876/20134) | 1st Serve % | 69% (6854/9960) |
| 60% (7747/12876) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (3941/6854) |
| 42% (3025/7258) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1348/3106) |
| 50% (1395/2791) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (690/1389) |
| 48% (9942/20625) | Return Points Win % | 48% (4894/10170) |
| 53% (175/330) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (112/182) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 45% (26/58) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (16/26) |
| 45% (42/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (30/51) |
| 84% (183/154) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (103/95) |
| 14% (183/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (103/8) |
| 15% (155/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (82/20) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
